Evanston RoundTable article, Aug. 1, 2001 Unequal Opportunities:
Is Affordable Housing in Evanston an Oxymoron?
By Beth Demes
Affordable housing advocates packed a recent Housing and Community Development
Committee public hearing, urging members to address the housing needs
of lower and moderate income residents.
Interfaith Housing Development Corporation has helped with affordable
housing in Evanston,
such as this apartment building in southeast Evanston.
Yet the purpose of the July 17 meeting, Chairman Ann Rainey, Alderman
of the 8th Ward, repeatedly reminded the speakers, was to hear how the
City might spend the roughly $2 million in Community Development Block
Grant funds available for public service programs, not discuss housing
policy. The Committee wanted to react to proposed programs and projects
from the community, some of which could be affordable housing developments.
"We have the money," said Ald. Rainey. "We encourage community
empowerment and control. We [as a Committee] do not have the power to
control a project."
But with a shrinking supply of apartments and skyrocketing rents and
home prices in Evanston, the housing advocates were not about to be deterred.
"Four of you have the power to set policy for this community,"
Michael Phillips, a 47-year resident and treasurer of the Evanston Neighborhood
Conference, told the four aldermen who serve on the Committee. "When
we wanted Home Depot here, deals were cut. When we wanted to buy the Bell
and Howell property and bring in Target, deals were cut. When we, as a
community, want to have things here, the elected officials decide what
we should have here."
Gail Schecter, executive director of the Winnetka-based Interfaith Housing
Center of the Northern Suburbs, pointed out to the Committee that more
than 800 apartments were converted to condos in Evanston between 1990
and 1998. At the same time, local non-profits have developed 70 units
of affordable housing - not enough to keep up with the loss of affordable
units. Interfaith Housing Development Corporation, affiliated with the
Housing Center, produced some of those units.
Ms. Schecter, whose organization operates home-sharing and tenant advocacy
programs that serve Evanston and other North Shore suburbs, also referred
to a recent Chicago Sun-Times article that cited prices from $172,000
to more than $700,000 for new condominiums in Evanston.
"There is a real contradiction between what we see happening and
what is in [Evanston's] Consolidated Plan," she said. The Plan calls
for improving housing opportunities for very low-, low- and moderate-income
residents.
Perhaps the most compelling evidence of the problem came from the personal
stories shared by Evanston residents.
"A couple months ago I was in the housing market, and I found that
the average three- bedroom apartment was around $1,600 per month,"
Eve Bonnet, a 37-year Evanston resident and single mother, told the Committee.
"In order to qualify for that, you have to make $76,000 a year. I
don't know many people who make that on a single salary."
She said at one time she had a Section 8 certificate but was unable to
use it because she could not find an Evanston landlord of decent housing
who would accept it and she did not want to move out of the community.
Alderman Joe Kent, 5th Ward, asked Ms. Bonnet whether lower income residents'
difficulty in purchasing homes was because of down-payment or credit problems.
"I think it would be a little bit of both," she said. "If
you have no money, your credit is damaged because you don't have enough
money to make ends meet every month. People'don't have the money to keep
up with everything. If your housing cost is more than half of your income,
then you struggle to pay for all the other things that you have to buy'You
are already working at a deficit, so you can't save for a down-payment."
The Committee and the advocates agreed on one thing: that the amount
of money the City has for affordable housing development, such as CDBG
funds, barely makes a dent in Evanston's need. Even when State funds for
housing are factored in, non-profit developers, whom the City assumes
are the only developers interested in this type of housing, do not have
enough money to create a substantial number of affordable units here.
To increase production of affordable housing, Ms. Schecter, Mr. Phillips
and others suggested that the City adopt an "inclusionary zoning"
ordinance. Under this policy, no developer would be able
to build a new
or rehab an existing residential project of a certain size without including
some affordable units. (See story on page 5.)
Ms. Schecter also suggested the City could use Tax Increment Financing
to finance affordable housing developments or CDBG funds to set up a community
credit union.
The credit union sparked the most interest from the Committee. They noted
that the credit union should have the same expectations for repayment
as a bank and should offer an education program on personal finance and
budgeting for its members.
"There are mechanisms to make [affordable housing] happen,"
Ms. Schecter said in a separate interview about the challenges. "If
the City really wants to do it, they can do it."
|